Free Essays on The Killing Game

â€Å"The killing game† Before reading â€Å"The killing game† by Joy Williams, I considered myself a â€Å"non-hunter†. However, after reading â€Å"The killing game†, I had mixed feelings of how I felt about hunting. I think Williams unjustly stereotyped all hunters as being â€Å"immoral† without consideration for another point of view. I decided to look equally at both sides of this issue to determine which side, â€Å"non-hunter† or â€Å"anti-hunter†, I would support. I interviewed my friend, Dona Mayo, about hunting. I believed that she would know about hunting since she had hunted in the past and her father is an active hunter. She considers herself to be a â€Å"non-hunter† now but does support the rights of a limited amount of hunting for appropriate reasons. Her family always takes home and eats all the animals they kill. Any left over meat is donated to church or given to other families. Every edible part of the animal is eaten. The head is kept as a trophy if it has a good rack. They prefer to hunt deer, turkey and squirrel. At one point, in 1985 lots of people were laid off from work. They had to rely on hunting to supply them with meat when they could no longer afford to buy any. She did have a friend of hers that was involved in a hunting related accident. His name was Chris, when he was thirteen he had accidentally shot and killed his father by laying a gun that had a bullet lodged in the rifle while climbing a fence. It is illegal to hunt in state parks in Mississippi. Taxpayers pay extra for license to hunt in preserves, and the money hunters pay go towards the parks. She believes hunting illegally in parks should have license revoked, and pay fines and/or jail time. I finally asked Ms. Mayo how she felt of the comment from â€Å"The killing game†; â€Å"Sport hunting is immoral; it should be made illegal. Hunters are persecutors of nature who should be prosecuted.† She respon... Free Essays on The Killing Game Free Essays on The Killing Game â€Å"The killing game† Before reading â€Å"The killing game† by Joy Williams, I considered myself a â€Å"non-hunter†. However, after reading â€Å"The killing game†, I had mixed feelings of how I felt about hunting. I think Williams unjustly stereotyped all hunters as being â€Å"immoral† without consideration for another point of view. I decided to look equally at both sides of this issue to determine which side, â€Å"non-hunter† or â€Å"anti-hunter†, I would support. I interviewed my friend, Dona Mayo, about hunting. I believed that she would know about hunting since she had hunted in the past and her father is an active hunter. She considers herself to be a â€Å"non-hunter† now but does support the rights of a limited amount of hunting for appropriate reasons. Her family always takes home and eats all the animals they kill. Any left over meat is donated to church or given to other families. Every edible part of the animal is eaten. The head is kept as a trophy if it has a good rack. They prefer to hunt deer, turkey and squirrel. At one point, in 1985 lots of people were laid off from work. They had to rely on hunting to supply them with meat when they could no longer afford to buy any. She did have a friend of hers that was involved in a hunting related accident. His name was Chris, when he was thirteen he had accidentally shot and killed his father by laying a gun that had a bullet lodged in the rifle while climbing a fence. It is illegal to hunt in state parks in Mississippi. Taxpayers pay extra for license to hunt in preserves, and the money hunters pay go towards the parks. She believes hunting illegally in parks should have license revoked, and pay fines and/or jail time. I finally asked Ms. Mayo how she felt of the comment from â€Å"The killing game†; â€Å"Sport hunting is immoral; it should be made illegal. Hunters are persecutors of nature who should be prosecuted.† She respon...

Claude Monet - Water Lily Pond essays

Claude Monet - Water Lily Pond essays Claude Monet always stood alone; his feet resounding heavily on the solid road that he was determined to follow until the very end. With tiny, dabbing brush strokes his paintings, more often than not exploded in the golden richness of the sun. With Monet a brush stroke, while imprecise, can suggest an infinity of objects that go beyond the instant and eternalize it. Born in Paris on the 14th November 1840, Claude Monet was one of the masters of the style of art known as Impressionism. The name 'Impressionism ¡ was invented as a term of abuse, hurled by a critic after seeing the Monet painting 'Impression: Sunrise ¡ at an exhibition in 1874. Yet those who practiced the style of art adopted the slur with dignity. During his life, Monet painted many series of paintings, each one based on a certain subject. One such series is the 'Japanese Bridge ¡ painted in 1899 after the death of his second wife Suzanne. Nine out of eleven paintings were given the title 'Water Lily Pond, ¡ and through out the series an idealized world emerges, an enclosed and secure paradise. Proportion of the objects in the 'Water Lily Pond ¡ relates directly to their proximity to each other. The aquatic plants that float on the top of the water in the foreground of the piece are large in comparison to those underneath the bridge, whilst the bridge arching over the pond is large, despite being towards the top of painting and thus further away. Yet the imposing size of the bridge dominates the painting regardless. In the 'Water Lily Pond, ¡ the bridge moves over the pond, lending the painting it ¡s rhythm, drawing the eyes of the viewer along the bridge and under the lake, where the shadow of the bridge lies. Rhythm is also conveyed by the use of similar colours and the textures used on the foliage. Each brush stroke placed on the canvas by Monet is part of the symphony that makes up the piece. Short, dabbing motions of his brush create the mirage of...

Women Rights within The Antislavery Movement Essay

Women Rights within The Antislavery Movement - Essay Example In the world political history, it has been revealed that a group of courageous women stood tall and began to push for a fair treatment of the fairer sex .Among such outstanding female figures is Sklar and Grimkes disobeyed gender norms and began to campaign against the positioning of women in the kitchen. This paper therefore seeks to discuss the social, economic and political realignments that took place in the American continent in the wake of Anti-slavery movement.2 When this slavery abolishment was gaining popularity and spreading across the North America, some women took this chance to advance the right of women in the early 1830’s .The ensuing battle between women and men over this gender agenda is the subject of focus in this paper and it will shed light on how this turned social tables across the globe that its effects is in play to date. When the anti-slavery set in across North America, it came as a godsend to the womenfolk because they grabbed this opportunity to h ighlight the plight of fellow women. Sklar and Grimkes played an exemplary role negotiating for the rights of women in the society within the confusion of slave trade abolition. It has been believed from time immemorial that the societal framework gives men the absolute authority over women who are expected to submit in return. Some of the gender roles that the society imposed on women in the North were oppressive and demeaning to women. Before this social revolutionary movement, womanhood was associated with reproductive issues, home care, kitchen and total submission to the male counterpart. On the side of the coin, men boasted of autonomous decision making which gave them upper hand in matters revolving around social, economical and political aspects of the society. It should however be noted that during this politically tensed period, religious revival missions was sweeping across the continent and the major participants were women. It was relatively easy to drive points home wi th the revival campaigns and this made it a bit easy for the message to penetrate the society. With this atmosphere, there was a reckoning force that could not be contained by the long standing demands of the civil society.3 This finally forced a changed in the notion that existed concerning the confined role of women in the society and the patriarchal power of the male over female. Although the wind of anti slavery was an overriding matter of debate, it did not come to the realization of men that a gender coup was also brewing in the guise of religious revival dominated by women. The female members of the society made great noise about the recognition of their rights and they mobilised women to take up political roles and fight for their rightful place in the society. The word that persuaded many women is the perceived gender equality as stipulated creator in the religious scripts and the bible. This came as a surprise to men as it dawned on them that they were losing the equality war to women but it seemed too late. Sklar and Grimkes were themselves daughters to slave owners but broke the silence and were at the forefront of championing for recognition of women amidst the anti-slavery movement. The oratory skills displayed by women during that time were to the shock of many people and went further to win the heart of women and socially moderate men. At this point the womanhood had already begun to change its face and gain new position in the society. Gender mainstreaming in the political and economic decisions began to gain recognition and started extending its roots gradually across the world. In this respect, men started to face cut throat competition from women in